Posts Tagged ‘environmental’

Paul Stamets’ Mycelium Running

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Mycelium Running by Paul Stamets has been the perpetual best-seller on popular mycology since published in 2005. It’s an indispensible reference book for anybody working the land, especially foresters, farmers and environmental cleanup contractors. It’s also a great book for anyone interested in growing their own food mushrooms.

The book is filled to the brim with valuable information on how to improve soils for farming, gardening and forestry; create simple, low-cost biofilters for waste water (mycofiltration); and clean up toxic waste (mycoremediation).

A detailed description of Mycofiltration, the use of mushrooms to filter waste water, is given in one section of the book. It lists recommended mushroom species and materials to use in creating the mycofiltration bed, as well as dimensions, depth, layers, etc. Mycofiltration beds like this can be effectively used for both industrial waste water and farm runoff.

Not only does it solve the problem of farm runoff and E. coli contamination of nearby streams, it can also yield highly palatable food mushrooms, and the bed itself can be dug out every 2-3 years and then used as an excellent fertilizer for the farm.

Also useful for farmers is the information on no-till farming, which involves a method of leaving the stubble on the field until the next crops is planted. This encourages the development of saprophytic fungi, which break down old plant matter at a pace that’s highly beneficial for new plant life. In contrast, the conventional method of plowing down the stubble after harvest promotes anaerobic bacteria, which decompose organic substrate too rapidly. The saprophytic fungi also help prevent soil erosion and leaching of valuable nutrients and top soil.

Saprophytic fungi benefit forests too, by breaking down organic matter but also help by competing with parasitic fungi (blights), which may kill thousands of trees if not stopped. Foresters can easily seed saprophytic mushrooms in blight infested areas as a natural fungicide against parasitic fungi, fighting fire with fire.

Mycorrhizal fungi likewise can be seeded to support tree growth, or these beneficial fungi may simply be encouraged to grow naturally through smarter and more enlightened forest management.

Mycorrhizal fungi help extend the reach of tree roots to better absorb nutrients and water, thus making the trees healthier and more drought resistant. Mycorrhizal fungi also manufacture and provide trees with natural antibiotics against many pathogens, especially parasitic fungi.

Mushroom mycelium can also be utilized to clean up toxic waste sites through a method known as mycoremediation. The term was invented by the author of Mycelium Running, Paul Stamets, but was in common use before the publication of this book.

Synthetic toxic compounds including petrochemicals, dioxins, neurotoxins, toxic industrial waste and much more can be effectively broken down by fungi into harmless compounds. Bacterial contaminants such E. coli can be killed by anti-bacterial compounds excreted by the fungi. And toxic levels of heavy metals may be absorbed and concentrated by mushrooms, which can then be harvested and safely deposed.

At $50 per ton, mycoremediation is a very cost effective method to clean up toxic waste. Conventional incineration may cost upwards of $1,500 per ton.

The information listed above is still only the first half of this tome. The second half is filled with information on growing mushroom mycelium, which can then be used for the above-mentioned purposes, or for growing our own medicinal or edible mushrooms. And who doesn’t love gourmet mushrooms? In other words, this is not only a book for farmers, foresters, ecologists and mycologists. This is a valuable reference book for every home and household.

Dr. Markho Rafael has worked in natural health since finishing Chiropractic College in the mid-90’s. He currently specializes in medicinal fungi, frequently consulting two reference books: Mycelium Running by Paul Stamets for medicinal, biological and chemical properties of mushrooms, and Mushrooms Demystified by David Arora, the most complete identification guide for North American mushrooms.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Water Filtration – Should You Do It?

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

These days, it’s fair to say that the majority of people are well aware of the requirement to drink sufficient water in order to keep in good health, avoid becoming dehydrated and to function efficiently. The precise amount of water that you will need will vary according to your body mass, size, ambient conditions and the average level of physical activity which you undertake. However, there seems to be general agreement among most medical authorities, who currently suggest that the average person should drink somewhere between six and eight large glasses of water daily.

Medical advice such as this has been used in advertising campaigns by bottled water suppliers as a means of marketing their product. The market for bottled water is actually a fairly new development – but it is extremely large. Between 1997 and 2005 sales of bottled water more than doubled. Currently, over 200 billion bottles of water are sold worldwide every year.

That’s a lot of empty bottles being thrown away. Some – a little less than 25% according to current statistics – are recycled. The rest end up as landfill. The environmental consequences are significant. It’s estimated that if all those empty bottles were lined up end to end, the distance covered would be enough to get to the moon and back – 56 times!

The amount of carbon emissions involved, both in the production of the bottles and the transportation of the finished product, is also worthy of consideration. It’s an amazing fact that the production of the bottles uses three times as much water as the bottles contain when they are shipped.

Bottled water is, simply put, an environmental disaster. Of course, it’s just possible that you may be more concerned with your own health than that of the planet’s – which might be understandable in some cases. The problem with this line of reasoning is that there is no evidence that bottled water is any better for your health than plain old tap water.

In Europe and North America tap water is subject to very rigorous testing to ensure quality and is perfectly safe to drink. Bottled water actually has fewer tests and has been found to contain various chemicals including oestrogen and even uranium. Some of the chemicals which can be found in bottled water “leech” from the plastic body of the bottle. It’s also well known that many bottled waters contain salt – which is not good for hypertension sufferers.

The only feasible reason for using bottled water would be if you prefer the taste. However, blind taste tests have shown that the large majority of consumers are unable to tell the difference between bottled water and tap water. Of course, if your home is situated in an area supplied with hard water, or if you really can’t stand the taste of the water from the tap (possibly due to chlorine which is sometimes added to the water in order to kill off bacteria) you may like to consider some other alternatives.

You could consider using a home filtration system – which will be better for the environment, better for your health and considerably cheaper than bottled water. You can install whole house filtration systems, under sink filters or even just use something as simple as a Brita filter jug. All of these solutions will remove contaminants, enhance taste and reduce water hardness in a manner which is environmentally friendly.

Get great tasting water in an economical and environmentally friendly manner with a Brita water filter – or why not try a Brita kettle for great tasting hot drinks?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

Conventional Cars vs Hybrid Cars

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

Today, the question on everybody’s lips is, what is the real difference between a hybrid car and a conventional vehicle? They suppose that there has to be some good reason why people are wondering whether hybrid cars are worth the money and checking their wallets and bank accounts to see if they can afford to buy a hybrid car.

There has to be a good reason why some other people wouldn’t dream of spending their the money on a hybrid car because they feel their conventional car gets them to wherever they need to go well enough. Here are some of the reasons why a person might decide on a conventional car over a hybrid car.

Hybrid cars are much more expensive than conventional cars: because hybrid cars have a complex internal design, they do still have a fairly hefty price on them, although, conventional cars, which have become more efficient as the years have gone on, are very affordable these days. Many people are selling their older conventional cars in favour of newer, more efficient versions.

In fact, they are so inefficient, in comparison, that some people even give their old cars away. However, since a large percentage of the general populace has never owned a hybrid, there aren’t many people selling used hybrid cars yet. Therefore, a person looking to buy a hybrid would probably have to purchase a new one from a car dealership.

Both a hybrid car and a conventional car use a similar type of battery: a hybrid car and a conventional car both make use of lead-acid batteries that have enough power to turn a small electric motor. These batteries are what you call “gear reduced”. That means that they can turn over this electric motor at approximately 300 rpms. Torque is generated to turn over the engine and the entire process is what starts the main petrol or diesel engine.

However, even though a hybrid car uses a lead-acid battery, the battery it uses to drive the car’s electric motor is of a different construction entirely. This kind of battery is known as a ‘deep cycle battery’ and it can be compared to the batteries that are used to move electric fork-lift trucks, some milk floats or golf carts.

That’s the main difference between a hybrid car and a conventional car. One person might choose a hybrid car because it makes them feel more secure. For instance, if a person buys a hybrid car, they can feel secure that their car will be less likely to run out of petrol. Another person might not choose a conventional car because the cost of petrol doesn’t really bother them that much.

However, a conventional car provides security as well, although of a different sort. With a conventional car, an owner can be sure that they can always go to a junkyard, if they need to replace old parts on their car. On the other hand, those with a hybrid car will more than likely have to face some pretty pricey repair receipts if something goes wrong.

However, the final decision is up to you. There are risks involved with both types of cars. But those who like to try out new things might just consider splurging out on a hybrid car.

If you are interested in the insides of New Hybrid Vehicles, just visit our website at http://new-hybrid-vehicles.com You can get a unique content version of this article from the Uber Article Directory.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace